So what is the unit for atomic mass?

The answer is simple - there isn't one!  Atomic masses are relative masses.   This means that they are unitless.

The original idea of relative atomic masses came from John Dalton.  Others before Dalton - Lavoisier for one - had used the concept of combination of simple substances into more complex compounds.  However, it was Dalton who realized that if these particles had their own unique mass they could account for the Law of Conservation of Mass. 

Dalton believed, mistakenly, that only one atom of one kind could combine with another.  He invented a series of symbols to represent each atom.  Notice that only his formula for carbon monoxide would be considered correct today.  He analyzed the decomposition of water, which produces eight weights of oxygen for every one weight of hydrogen, and concluded (incorrectly, since he was using the wrong formula for water) that an oxygen "simple", an atom, was eight times heavier than a hydrogen atom.  Though his idea of atoms was brilliant, his mistaken concept that compounds had only single atoms of each element caused him to reject many ideas that later turned out to be much better - including that of Avogadro.  Nevertheless Dalton's concept of relative mass was doubtless his greatest contribution to chemistry. 

Which of the following are correct? Check all that apply.
a) Dalton's belief that all compounds contained only one of each atom is still in use today.
b) Dalton invented the concept of relative atomic mass.
c) Dalton was the first person to believe that different elements could combine to make compounds.
d) Dalton rejected the ideas of Avogadro because they conflicted with his view of the universe.
e) Dalton's symbols for many compounds are still the same today.

Why are atomic masses unitless?  It is because they are relative masses where the mass of one atom is compared to the other.   Although we can't find the mass of any individual atom, we can easily find the mass of a bunch.  If we could find the mass of the same sized bunch of atoms of two different kinds, say Hydrogen and Oxygen, then we could compare their masses. Provided that we have the same number of atoms in each bunch, this is easy to do.  This is where the work of Avogadro becomes so important. 

A million is a bunch.  However, it is not a very big bunch as you can see from these numbers:
mass of 1 million oxygen molecules 53.16  x 10-18 g
mass of 1 million hydrogen molecules   3.349 x 10-18 g
What is the relative mass of oxygen to hydrogen to four significant digits, based on these numbers?

Back

Next Page

Index

|

Back

|

Next

|

Index

|


Copyright © 1998 - 2008 David Dice